Reflections on Vancouver, British Columbia and other topics, related or not

 

Racially motivated governance

Recognized by deed but not by word, Canada’s
hierarchy of special interests couldn’t be more obvious

Greg Klein | May 25, 2025

 

 

The concept recently got rare MSM recognition—and in the Vancouver Sun, a contender for the country’s flakiest daily paper. That is, the concept was recognized. The reality of Canada’s racial hierarchy wasn’t.

The reference came up in an op-ed by John Rustad, a former establishment prat now posing as a “conservative.” Here’s how he put it:

In a disturbing statement in the legislature from Burnaby East MLA Rohini Arora, it was suggested that all non-Indigenous British Columbians should self-identify as “colonizers,” “settlers” and “uninvited guests.” This was her proposed answer to solving the challenges faced by Indigenous peoples across British Columbia.

Her comments represent the worst kind of tokenism. This alarming position embodies the NDP’s complete abandonment of mutual respect, equality and collaboration in the way that they govern.

Simply put, they are advocating for a racial hierarchy of British Columbians.

Advocating? She spoke in support of a hierarchy that’s solidly entrenched, and with natives at the very pinnacle.

Anyway, Rustad continued: “The notion that people of all non-Indigenous ethnicities, backgrounds and religious beliefs are intruders is beyond offensive.”

Of course, but it’s surprising that anyone in the mainstream would say so. Closer to the norm was Arora’s ditzy little speech—conventionally stupid, sanctimonious and self-indulgent, she came across as a horrible little girl sucking up to a corrupt theocracy.

The hierarchy, though, isn’t entirely racial. Other special interests have a place including the Quebecois, middle class white women (for the time being), immigrants, “refugees,” the alphabet people and, in B.C. especially, junkies.

 

Few groups rank high enough to stop a homo parade.
Toronto blacks did so, demonstrating their superior status.

 

And although the bigotry/favouritism system is solidly established, levels of status within the hierarchy can change. A fairly recent, dramatic example involves the shifting positions of Jews and Muslims. Middle class white women have been slipping as Karen loses her exemption from white guilt. The relative status of others, for example blacks versus Arabs, can sometimes be hard to determine. Status can differ in various parts of the country too, with blacks maybe still at Toronto’s summit and Quebecois, of course, reigning supreme in Quebec.

But as has long been known to white men—not to put too fine a point on it, but English-speaking heterosexual white men who aren’t drug-addicted or Jewish—and as their female counterparts are discovering, one’s place in the hierarchy determines much in life: education, employment, law, health care, government services, government benefits, social status, perceived moral standing and participation in public discourse. Examples abound in every area.

While “hierarchy” comprises an unacknowledged elephant in the room, other mammoth creatures also crowd the place. Among them is the question of how society will be affected by granting virtually unlimited power, privilege and money to any single group. All this continues under the absurd pretense that Canada’s most powerful ethnics suffer racial discrimination.

Considering all that power and privilege, it’s fair to ask when aboriginals might develop competent leadership. For about 28 years now B.C. Indian chiefs have been re-electing their “grand chief,” inarticulate dolt Stewart Phillip.

Two pathetic but powerful mongers of self-pity, self-righteousness and dishonesty have been Kimberly Murray and the late Murray Sinclair. Sinclair was a judge, senator, university chancellor, truth and reconciliation commissioner, extravagantly malicious racist liar and, considering the impression he gave, a borderline retard. The same with Murray, a law professor who’s been an Ontario assistant deputy attorney general and a federal “special interlocutor” on “unmarked graves.” Kamloops native chief Rosanne Casimir pushes her 215 graves deceit far beyond any sane or three-digit IQ level, all the while refusing to provide evidence or allow investigation.

Through lazy, incompetent leaders like Judith Sayers, Boyd Peters and Kory Wilson, the B.C. First Nations Justice Council squanders opportunities to speak out on legitimate issues. Retired Green MLA/NDP handpuppet Adam Olsen showed how easily he could be manipulated to betray Green principles as well as support an ethically corrupt, mostly white cop status quo.

Speaking of manipulation, former NDP MLA Melanie Mark’s outrageously racist/sexist legislature meltdown might have been engineered by party brass.

While chief administrative officer of Nanaimo, Tracy Fleck (aka Tracy Samra) propelled an ongoing clusterfuck of managerial dysfunction, personnel discord and high-level defections before getting another high-paying job with Natural Resources Canada. As for the upcoming generation, they’re subject to almost unbelievably petty, malicious role models like Cal Albright, Leslie Varley and Robert Phillips.

These aren’t isolated examples. These goofballs typify the crème de la crème of Canada’s racial elite, the highest-ranking bigshots of Canada’s highest-ranking people.

 

Might he be different? Even if Kinew’s a mere mediocrity, he’s
functioning stupendously by Canadian native leadership standards.
If he’s worse than mediocre, the media will not tell us.

 

Exceptions? A conspicuous example might be Manitoba premier Wab Kinew. Those lacking insight into Manitoba politics, however, have no way to evaluate him outside of MSM coverage. Canadian media almost never report or comment critically about aboriginals. Journalists, racist hypocrites that they are, hold natives to a much lower standard than they do others.

Top of the pyramid but lowest in contempt—a feat of cognitive dissonance.

But back to the earlier question of how natives’ extraordinary power will affect the larger society: Aboriginal super-empowerment, and for that matter the special status of other more-special-than-thou people, demonstrates Canada’s strongest manifestation of the West’s multi-faceted social revolution. The revolution’s purpose is to remake society, apparently by first destroying it.

Or maybe the purpose is to stop there.