Reflections on Vancouver, British Columbia and other topics, related or not

 

The vapidity of evil

Thoroughly stupid but empowered
race hustlers enhance regime control

Greg Klein | August 22, 2023

 

Kike Ojo-Thompson demonstrates erratic thinking by continually interrupting
her fragments of incomplete “thoughts” with other fragments of incomplete
“thoughts.” But her tone is triumphant, her manner is overbearing and
her gist is clear: Whites must feel guilty for their moral inferiority.

 

KOJO Institute CEO Kike Ojo-Thompson isn’t just a vile racist. She isn’t just an establishment-approved and funded vile racist either. She’s an establishment-approved and funded vile racist who’s dumb as shit.

Imagine having not only to believe her nonsensical bullshit but also follow her nonsensical orders. Here she is, hectoring her subjects in a near-shout with some sort of demand that she can’t express better than this:

It’s you, you are the 600 people, 200 at a time, we painstakingly went through four weeks of 200 people at a time, so that you would all know and have heard this exact conversation and that someone would start to live the anti-racist leadership that you know. Which one of you will it be? Which one of you will it be to do it, and then say to the super, to the AD, to the D, you know what I’m saying right, associate director director’s office, “You made me sit through four weeks and now you’re not backing me on this thing.” Who is going to be brave enough to do it? Which one of you? Right? Don’t look at me. [She laughs.] I’m telling you what, I’m telling you what the facts are, what the truth is and what the problem is. I’m telling you even the pathway to the answer. Are you going to do it? And and this is so, so it’s a really [unclear word] it’s actually really ridiculous, like all 600 of you will have heard the same thing. What are you going to do with it? Right?

As giddy as a princess on meth, she sounds even worse than this brief transcript suggests. And it leaves off before she states that the late Toronto school principal Richard Bilkszto, an anti-racist white, supported white supremacy by saying that Canadian kids have better educational opportunities than American kids.

Yet the power of characters like Ojo-Thompson increases steadily as all aspects of life have to comply with the Gleichschaltung.

And its stupidity. Headfucks imposed by stupid, powerful people strengthen regime control by keeping people as confused as they are scared.

 

Suggesting extreme vanity in addition to hateful stupidity,
photos of CEO Kike Ojo-Thompson proliferate on the KOJO
Institute website. But such is the power bestowed on her
that Ojo-Thompson’s racist bullying might have caused
Richard Bilkszto’s suicide.

 

This time, very belatedly and to a limited degree, the process has been criticized by a few MSM outlets like the National Post and Toronto Sun, as well as not quite MSM and more comprehensive in its reporting, Quillette. Predictably even more media, like Canadian Press, the Globe and Mail and especially the Toronto Star, have emphasized their support. But critics focused on how an “anti-racist” like Bilkszto can be driven to despair by the need to agree with absolutely every iota of Ojo-Thompson’s tirades. Those critics have hardly acknowledged the rampant idiocy of people like Ojo-Thompson.

Or the fact that similarly weird and indefensible practices have been widespread for decades.

Previously given labels like sensitivity training or life skills training, they didn’t necessarily start with a racist agenda. But they still fucked with peoples’ heads.

This might have roots in the 1970s with the Ashkenazi neuroticism that began influencing Hollywood, and the fashionable interest in psychotherapy and related enthusiasms, possibly exploiting female susceptibility to emotional tension. Very odd practices have long been mandatory in workplaces and government programs.

Just one example is the Saskatchewan NewStart Life Skills course, an inexplicably freakish practice that Ottawa imposed on federally funded job trainees by the early 1990s at least. The program employs cult-like instructors and enforces compliance by encouraging its most zealous initiates to gang up on any skeptic, often through attacks of verbal abuse. The personally intrusive requirements drive some women to tears. (Click here to read an example.) Refusal to take part in all aspects of the program, no matter how twisted, can get a participant kicked off a job training course.

Such was my experience. Questions about the program’s purpose brought evasive and sometimes angry responses from the Sask NewStart flakes and federal training program administrators.

Around then I heard that Alberta teacher training forced students into rituals of self-abasement. At the time these requirements weren’t easily categorized as ideological, just inexplicably weird.

But racist indoctrination sessions were well on their way. About the late ’80s or early ’90s the Globe and Mail ran a laudatory feature about a guilt-mongering event at the Toronto branch of an American corporation. The procedure began with video of the CEO demanding compliance. The on-site black instructor then told participants to raise their hands if they’ve ever suffered racial discrimination. All the non-whites responded predictably. The instructor then told participants to raise their hands if they’ve ever suffered sexual discrimination. All the women responded predictably. Not exactly a milieu conducive to discussions of anti-white, anti-male discrimination, the obvious divide-and-conquer strategy singled out white guys as oppressors.

More recently I’ve been told that Ontario teacher training takes a fairly similar approach, demanding that white men (presumably straight white men) admit historical guilt. That might help explain the paucity of male teachers, and maybe also the weirdness of those men who do become teachers.

In all these situations it’s easy to imagine demoralized, often frightened subjects, albeit with some acolytes eager to demonstrate obedience. At any rate, speaking out means risking one’s livelihood or future job prospects. Even if it didn’t, Ojo-Thompson-style hectoring blocks intelligent input, not to mention debate or dissent. Generations of propaganda, social conditioning and government mandates empower Ojo-Thompson-type stupidity, moronic bullshit that would otherwise be easily dismissed. That stupidity increases the headfuck, adding confusion to fear in a manner that benefits regime control.

Speaking of headfucks, that’s been one of the overall effects of black immigration to Toronto, Ojo-Thompson’s main target area. Few blacks lived in the city prior to the Caribbean migration of the 1970s and ’80s. American news and entertainment media had already been lionizing blacks as the most oppressed but wonderful creatures in existence. So conditioned, Toronto’s sheltered elites welcomed these newcomers as absolutely fantastic people bringing ineffable qualities to a dismally white city. But despite all the preferences awarded to Toronto blacks in employment, government services, law, education and elsewhere, they reproduced the same social pathology blacks create everywhere they inhabit in significant numbers. The headfuck consists of whites having to believe official propaganda about black virtue that contradicts observation and personal experience.

 

The Network for the Advancement of Black Communities actually
cited “compassionate learning environment” as a rationale for
supporting Kike Ojo-Thompson’s racist vituperation.

 

Of course not all individuals fit generalizations. So it’s disappointing that, as far as I’ve seen, no blacks have publicly denounced black racists like Ojo-Thompson and the lucrative hate-mongering industry she represents. Instead something calling itself the Network for the Advancement of Black Communities got away with defending Ojo-Thompson’s racism and calling for more of the same.

By no means do blacks have a monopoly on racist headfucks. Over recent years natives have subjected public discourse to a deluge of emotional bullshit. Headfucking native bigshot Kimberly Murray must be at least as stupid as headfucking black bigshot Ojo-Thompson.

Stupid whites also get appointed and promoted to bigshotdom on the basis of their stupidity. A great many federal and provincial cabinet ministers can’t nearly run their departments, let alone determine policy. That makes them pliable by party enforcers. Journalism (in Canada, an almost entirely white industry) has been regressing for decades, to some extent a deliberate policy as shown by preferential hiring for reporters who are manifestly stupid (not to mention almost always white). At all levels, institutionalized education—Bilkszto’s last employer—churns out sub-literate, inarticulate citizens who can’t think their way past wokish fallacies. The debased language of politicians, their appointees and their journalistic courtiers furthers public confusion that strengthens regime control.

The extent to which all this might be orchestrated probably can’t be determined. Even if it’s the accidental result of a society gone mad, the results increasingly show a confused and often fearful populace that hastens democratic decline.

The confusion couldn’t be more obvious, as so many Canadians show in conversation. Less obvious is the fear, especially when it’s hidden under a veneer of complacency. But next to no one has the courage to dispute official myths like genocide or black moral superiority.

All that makes people easier to control, when political correctness protects virtually all official ideology. That control can ease the way for a regime that’s authoritarian, dictatorial or outright totalitarian.

Ojo-Thompson obviously revels in her power. But, stupid as she so obviously is, she serves her masters well.

 

Here’s a Saskatchewan NewStart Life Skills requirement backed by the government department now called Employment and Social Development Canada:

Participants were told to write a list of the people closest to them, a fixed number that might have been five or six. Then participants were told to imagine they were with those people on a lifeboat far from safety. Next, participants were told to imagine that emergency supplies were sufficient only to support a number of passengers that was one less than the total. To save the others, the participant had to choose which of those loved ones gets thrown overboard. Then supplies dwindled more and the participant had to choose another loved one for certain death. And so on, until the participant had killed all of his or her closest loved ones.

The instructors, two South American weirdos, ordered selected students to read out their lists of sacrificial loved ones and explain how they were prioritized for death.

One student had tears streaming down her face as she did so. (Back.)